Comments on: So I got this comment on my post-election post… http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/ Like Mr. Furious with a really nice handbag. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:42:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 By: Anonymous http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-266 Anonymous Sun, 21 Nov 2004 20:40:00 +0000 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-266 And yes, I must also add this -- even during the peak of the Cold War, we never attacked Russia directly, and neither did they attack us directly. We played out our enmity out there in other countries, such as Afghanistan. It is stupidity to face your enemy head on, especially when doing so involves very great risks. On the other hand, it is stupidity to ignore them, too. Kerry would have spent all his time changing his opinions on these issues, while Islamic fundamentalism would be on the rise -- he is too weak to control or take a stance. And yes, I must also add this — even during the peak of the Cold War, we never attacked Russia directly, and neither did they attack us directly. We played out our enmity out there in other countries, such as Afghanistan. It is stupidity to face your enemy head on, especially when doing so involves very great risks. On the other hand, it is stupidity to ignore them, too. Kerry would have spent all his time changing his opinions on these issues, while Islamic fundamentalism would be on the rise — he is too weak to control or take a stance.

]]> By: Anonymous http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-265 Anonymous Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:44:00 +0000 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-265 Oh man, you need a lesson in international politics, economics and foreign policy. You seldom attack the strong - you attack those that will give you strategic positioning during a war. Guess which was the country the US attacked after Pearl Harbor? It was the French colony (who were our buddies) of Morocco. You cannot attack Saudi Arabia or Pakistan directly - they are powerful, and attacking them would affect our (and the world’s) economy. You need to play your strategies out very carefully. The US is buddies with Pakistan, while holding on to their nukes, and making sure it does not fall over to Afghanistan or any of the Arab nations. And yeah, talking of which, I can understand Pakistan - but India? Why would any one want to attack India? We’ve a presence in Israel, and (hopefully) soon in Iraq and Iran. We have already started out on North Korea, and that will soon be taken care of, too. Bush is an excellent choice. At times of war, you need someone able. There was a reason Winston Churchill was voted into power during WW-2. And oh, speaking of Kerry. He wanted to “strongly warn” Pakistan. And do what? Attack them? So that Jihadis get hold of their nukes and they nuke India, India nukes Pakistan, China joins in and we all die? I do not want the highschool debate captain, I want someone who can stand his ground (and not change his decisions every other minute). I do not want someone who will make us into yet another welfare state, but rather someone who will reinforce an economic system that’s been proven to work - capitalism. Bush ain’t the best President, but he sure as hell is _leagues_ ahead of Kerry. Lay off whatever crack that you’re smoking. Oh man, you need a lesson in international politics, economics and foreign policy.

You seldom attack the strong - you attack those that will give you strategic positioning during a war. Guess which was the country the US attacked after Pearl Harbor? It was the French colony (who were our buddies) of Morocco.

You cannot attack Saudi Arabia or Pakistan directly - they are powerful, and attacking them would affect our (and the world’s) economy. You need to play your strategies out very carefully. The US is buddies with Pakistan, while holding on to their nukes, and making sure it does not fall over to Afghanistan or any of the Arab nations. And yeah, talking of which, I can understand Pakistan - but India? Why would any one want to attack India?

We’ve a presence in Israel, and (hopefully) soon in Iraq and Iran. We have already started out on North Korea, and that will soon be taken care of, too. Bush is an excellent choice. At times of war, you need someone able. There was a reason Winston Churchill was voted into power during WW-2.

And oh, speaking of Kerry. He wanted to “strongly warn” Pakistan. And do what? Attack them? So that Jihadis get hold of their nukes and they nuke India, India nukes Pakistan, China joins in and we all die? I do not want the highschool debate captain, I want someone who can stand his ground (and not change his decisions every other minute). I do not want someone who will make us into yet another welfare state, but rather someone who will reinforce an economic system that’s been proven to work - capitalism.

Bush ain’t the best President, but he sure as hell is _leagues_ ahead of Kerry. Lay off whatever crack that you’re smoking.

]]> By: Rhapsodi http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-264 Rhapsodi Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:39:00 +0000 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-264 Way to GO! Very very very well put! Way to GO! Very very very well put!

]]> By: Zantiferous3 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-263 Zantiferous3 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 01:54:00 +0000 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-263 She thinks that starting a vindictive war with a country that had nothing to do with the 9/11 strikes was smart. That's scary. What does she think, I wonder, about the fact that after the strikes, "Mr.-Crazy-Cowboy-that-we-should-be-thankful-was-in-office" lifted the no-fly rules and allowed guess who... yep, the entire Bin-Laden family that was here in the States to leave the country - without questioning them??? Hmmm... could that be because the crazy cowboy Bushes had EXTENSIVE ties to the Bin-Ladens dating WAYYYY back and didn't want to trouble them with bothersome questions like, "hey, when's the last time you spoke to Uncle Osama???" Or was it because the United States TRAINED Bin-Laden in the art of war? Hmm... And even though 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi - they have TRILLIONS of dollars in our banks and OWN about 7% of the US - so we attack Saddam. *shaking head* what a tangled web your crazy cowboy has woven. Minority she says? Well, being in the minority isn't a bad thing. As I recall, it worked for Bush supporters last election. Poor thing, couldn't even swagger his "crazy cowboy" self into the White House via the regular route on the day he took office for all the protestors outside with picket signs who hated the fact that in the land of the free and home of the brave, where democracy reigns supreme, someone who lost the election could take office after problems counting votes in the state where his brother is Governor. Then this election - miraculously - the votes of the military who are overseas were not counted (think maybe because these men are tired of fighting a war that has no basis and want to come home?) and 60,000 absentee ballots were mysteriously lost in the mail from guess what state? FLORIDA again??? Who wants to bet that next presidential election we don't get a PEEP out of Florida with respect to calculating votes. I got $87,000,000,000 on it. *chuckle* Princess, even God isn't pleased with the outcome - hence the back to back hurricanes. They say now that what we need is acceptance, so I ACCEPT the defeat of our nation and want to be among the few people who voted for Kerry to congratulate George W. Bush on winning his <STRONG>FIRST</STRONG> presidential election. =) Princess... please... use your head and come up with an informed opinion instead of spouting off the propaganda and spoon-fed republican rhetoric. <EM>Sorry to blog on your blog Sid, you know that's SO out of character!!! LOL But that sh*t irked me.</EM> She thinks that starting a vindictive war with a country that had nothing to do with the 9/11 strikes was smart. That’s scary.

What does she think, I wonder, about the fact that after the strikes, “Mr.-Crazy-Cowboy-that-we-should-be-thankful-was-in-office” lifted the no-fly rules and allowed guess who… yep, the entire Bin-Laden family that was here in the States to leave the country - without questioning them??? Hmmm… could that be because the crazy cowboy Bushes had EXTENSIVE ties to the Bin-Ladens dating WAYYYY back and didn’t want to trouble them with bothersome questions like, “hey, when’s the last time you spoke to Uncle Osama???” Or was it because the United States TRAINED Bin-Laden in the art of war? Hmm… And even though 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi - they have TRILLIONS of dollars in our banks and OWN about 7% of the US - so we attack Saddam. *shaking head* what a tangled web your crazy cowboy has woven.

Minority she says? Well, being in the minority isn’t a bad thing. As I recall, it worked for Bush supporters last election. Poor thing, couldn’t even swagger his “crazy cowboy” self into the White House via the regular route on the day he took office for all the protestors outside with picket signs who hated the fact that in the land of the free and home of the brave, where democracy reigns supreme, someone who lost the election could take office after problems counting votes in the state where his brother is Governor.

Then this election - miraculously - the votes of the military who are overseas were not counted (think maybe because these men are tired of fighting a war that has no basis and want to come home?) and 60,000 absentee ballots were mysteriously lost in the mail from guess what state? FLORIDA again??? Who wants to bet that next presidential election we don’t get a PEEP out of Florida with respect to calculating votes. I got $87,000,000,000 on it. *chuckle* Princess, even God isn’t pleased with the outcome - hence the back to back hurricanes.

They say now that what we need is acceptance, so I ACCEPT the defeat of our nation and want to be among the few people who voted for Kerry to congratulate George W. Bush on winning his FIRST presidential election. =)

Princess… please… use your head and come up with an informed opinion instead of spouting off the propaganda and spoon-fed republican rhetoric.

Sorry to blog on your blog Sid, you know that’s SO out of character!!! LOL But that sh*t irked me.

]]> By: Zantiferous3 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-262 Zantiferous3 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 01:53:00 +0000 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-262 This post has been removed by the author. This post has been removed by the author.

]]> By: The Renegade http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-261 The Renegade Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:02:00 +0000 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-261 i do believe that douche got served. although, with a username like "Princess_1979"...hell, she was just asking for it. i do believe that douche got served.

although, with a username like “Princess_1979″…hell, she was just asking for it.

]]> By: Anonymous http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-260 Anonymous Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:10:00 +0000 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-260 and it doesn't get much better than that there. that's the best homie-don't-play-dat-three-tennis-balls-in-a-black-dress-sock bitch slap i've ever witnessed. game on... -thizz-faced negromaticus and it doesn’t get much better than that there. that’s the best homie-don’t-play-dat-three-tennis-balls-in-a-black-dress-sock bitch slap i’ve ever witnessed. game on…

-thizz-faced negromaticus

]]> By: Prince* http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-259 Prince* Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:02:00 +0000 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-259 Don't hurt the girl's feelings! DAMN! "You Go Girl!!!!!" lol Don’t hurt the girl’s feelings! DAMN!

“You Go Girl!!!!!”
lol

]]> By: Mary http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-258 Mary Fri, 12 Nov 2004 05:53:00 +0000 http://siddityinthecity.com/2004/11/12/so-i-got-this-comment-on-my-post-election-post/#comment-258 *applause* I'm not going to attempt to add a thing to that, Sid. Just wanted to say GOOD POST, especially the last paragraph. *applause* I’m not going to attempt to add a thing to that, Sid. Just wanted to say GOOD POST, especially the last paragraph.

]]>